How do independent record labels generally differ from major labels in terms of artist contracts?

Independent record labels are typically more artist-friendly compared to major labels, primarily because their business models often prioritize artist development and creative control. Independent labels are generally more willing to negotiate terms that suit the artist's vision and needs, allowing for greater creative expression and input in the production process. This flexibility can result in contracts that offer artists a larger share of their revenue and more favorable terms regarding ownership of their music.

In contrast, major labels typically have more rigid contract structures that may prioritize their own profits and commercial interests. They often impose stricter controls over the artist's creative process and may dictate certain aspects of marketing and distribution that can limit the artist's autonomy.

As for the other options, independent labels usually have more negotiation flexibility rather than less, and they tend to have looser guidelines for releases compared to the often more formal and structured processes of major labels. Additionally, while advances from major labels can be significant, independent labels generally have fewer resources to provide high advances, focusing instead on nurturing and developing talent in a supportive environment.